Earlier this month, the National Post ran a week long special of reports on the real estate industry and markets. This summary is from the article entitled, "No Money Down; Big Risk in Future", dated October 5, 2005, by Lori McLeod.
Some would consider the 100% mortgage the ultimate speculative tool for getting into the real estate boom. They are banking on the fact that housing prices are going to continue rising.
According to Paul Mims, VP of CIBC Mortgages, "...housing prices are only up in a strong economy. Just around the corner they could drop, and you're going to have to pay it all back." He goes on to say the product might work for one of the target markets cited by advertisers--young professionals like doctors and lawyers who have great credit and strong income potential, but also have big student loans and no savings.
According to Vince Gaetano, Sr. Mortgage Consultant with Monster Mortgage, few people in this category are actually going for no-money-down mortgages. It works more for those people trying to keep up with the Joneses.
The drawback with this type of product is the big premium associated with it. On a $300,000 home, a person taking on a 107% mortgage (the 7% is for closing costs), would pay an average of 5.9% interest on a 3-year fixed mortgage. That compares to a rate of 4.25% to 4 .5% for a customer with a 10% down payment for the same term.
Given this scenario, based on a bi-weekly mortgage payment and a 25-year amortization, and interest compounded semi-annually, the principal and interest paid works out to:
107% mortgage: Paid off $18,658.23 of principal and paid $54,496.76 in interest.
10% down at 4.5%: Paid of $18,884.42 of principal and paid $34,913.15 in interest.
The 107% mortgage pays $544 a month more in interest for the same home, and at the end of 3 years, their mortgage will still be $2500 more than the price of the home. This will be a costly loan if home values decline.
However, there is a lower forfeit rate on higher-borrowing mortgages. This is attributed to a more rigorous screening process to qualify for the loan.
The low-rate environment, combined with soaring hydro and energy costs, could definitely get homebuyers with no cushion into trouble, says Mr. Gaetano. "There's no wiggle room in houses. My income's not going up 30% like the cost of these staples." In his opinion, part of the blame falls on Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., which "isn't responsible enough to look at revising qualifying ratios at times like this."
High-borrowing mortgages aren't intended for people looking to flip a house quickly for profit, says Mr. Goode. But they are a good option for young professionals, students who live in the dwelling (up to a four-plex) and rent the other units for income, or newly divorced people with good credit but depleted savings after splitting up their assets.
For the truly house-hungry who have no savings, Mr. Gaetano says they'd be better off to exercise a little patience and reap the rewards of putting something down on their homes. He leaves investors with a final thought to chew over when mulling a 100%-plus mortgage: "It's never no money down. It's a transaction that feeds a lot of people--realtors, bankers, appraisers, everybody else except you."